But there are 5 offical classes. Safe, Euclid, Keter, Thaumiel, and Apollyon. This is often due to the fact that the Foundation has researched the SCP well enough that containment does not require significant resources or that the anomalies require a specific and conscious activation or trigger.
Classifying an SCP as Safe, however, does not mean that handling or activating it does not pose a threat. Class Euclid : Euclid-class SCPs are anomalies that require more resources to contain completely or where containment isn't always reliable.
Usually this is because the SCP is insufficiently understood or inherently unpredictable. Euclid is the Object Class with the greatest scope, and it's usually a safe bet that an SCP will be this class if it doesn't easily fall into any of the other standard Object Classes. Clef, the author of , did not intend for Apollyon to be a serious object class. Rather, the class was meant to indicate that the SCP article was abnormal, and that the documentation was something hidden even from most of the SCP Foundation.
The class is used in SCP and S. Explained SCPs are commonly articles about anomalies that are completely and fully understood to the point where their effects are now explainable by mainstream science or phenomena that have been debunked or falsely mistaken as an anomaly.
This class is used as a catch-all for SCPs - if an object is not Safe, Euclid or Keter, it is classed as Esoteric, in addition to whatever the secondary class is.
A classification for SCPs that were broken apart into components that are themselves anomalous, and that must be kept apart from each other. Usually meaning that they have died. An SCP about which nothing is known at all, but has not proven to be dangerous yet either. A classification for SCPs that should not be contained even though they are capable of being contained due to the detrimental effects of containment. The class originated in I.
Pickman's Proposal, an Proposal. There, the class indicated that containment would have a disastrous impact on the continued survival of humanity. More colloquially, the Archon class originally meant the SCP "will literally break the world if you contain it.
An object capable of causing a YK-End-of-the-Universe Scenario, or altering the universe in a serious, potentially detrimental manner through non-improbable means. It's the idea that all things perceived by the senses, including emotions, are not really "I" or "mine", and therefore, one should not cling to them.
It's one of the three marks of existence in buddhism. If a person lost these characteristics, they would cease to exist. More on object classes here. SCP - Classes. To most, there are just 3 Classes known, Safe, Euclid, Keter. But there are 5 offical classes. Safe, Euclid, Keter, Thaumiel, and Apollyon. Safe-class SCPs are anomalies that are easily and safely contained. He does appear to be God based on his abilities and anamalous properties Hume levels are HIGHER around him which is unique as generally Hume levels are lower around Reality benders, he has no defined appearance, There is something intrinsically good about him that affects those around him, etc.
Description: SCP - is a sapient entity or entities capable of initiating and exerting control over anomalous phenomena on Earth and in all regions of space observable thus far by modern scientific methods. Please see Addendum Apollyon : Used for SCPs that are impossible to contain, or are about to irrevocably break containment.
The classification was first used in SCP on the Editthis wiki in ; it essentially meant that the SCP was a particularly dangerous keter.
The class is used in SCP and S. Apollyon means completely uncontainable and extremely powerful. The majority of Keter -class SCPs are insentient, and most are inanimate objects. They are unwillingly recruited by the SCP Foundation worldwide and are usually death row inmates. The word Apollyon is defined as "the Greek name for Abaddon, the spiritual being or place named as the destroyer" so…..
But what is the Foundation, and what is it protecting and containing? The whole concept is disturbing.
0コメント